Staticize Reloaded

MaThIbUs | June 13th, 2004 @ 6:17 am

Sounds great, I will try this out!

Scott | June 13th, 2004 @ 7:32 am

Cool. I personally prefer plugins to includes, so I added a line to your code to allow me to exclude a function from the case as well as a include:

$store = preg_replace('|<!--fclude (.*?)-->(.*?)<!--/fclude-->|s', '<?php $1 ;?>', $buffer);

Then in my template I use the syntax:

<!--fclude heldomatic() -->
<?php heldomatic(); ?>
<!--/fclude-->

Seems to work.

Matt | June 13th, 2004 @ 12:18 pm

Well I suppose it could be easily modified to allow any PHP code, but because it’s included from inside a function every variable that was used would have to be explicitly global.

Kevin Francis | June 14th, 2004 @ 12:23 am

This sounds really nice. I’ll have to implement it on my site. I find that WordPress is quite easy on my machines load average though.

Mojo Jojo | June 14th, 2004 @ 11:55 am

Should I should exclude the following items:
- Related posts plugin
- Google AdSense

Matt | June 14th, 2004 @ 1:44 pm

Mojo, those should be fine if cached.

Ryan Schwartz | June 14th, 2004 @ 9:28 pm

heh - make that <!– Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.209 seconds –>
<!– Static Page Served in 0.003 seconds –> (php in comments = blank space…)

dowingba | June 14th, 2004 @ 11:49 pm

Still invalidates my pages when I use it. Is there something in the head section that I should be implementing with php includes?

Matt | June 15th, 2004 @ 10:05 pm

Dowingba, how does it invalidate your pages?

dowingba | June 15th, 2004 @ 11:56 pm

As far as I can tell, all the trackback rdf info shows up as invalid for some reason when I use the plugin (and the original version of the plugin). I deactivate the plugin and all is well. I’m assuming there’s some snippet of code in the head somewhere that isn’t being cached/served and the rdf stuff depends on it somehow.

supernoob boob | June 17th, 2004 @ 4:37 am

This is probably a php/fopen thang, but I noticed that if a parent directory is not world readable (even if +x), the script fails and says that it can’t create the temp files (although it creates the wp_content/cache dir just fine).

I am far from a php guru, but thought i’d mention that I had to chmod o+r all the way down my dir tree in order for this plugin to work (all previous plugins seemed to work okay before *shrug*).

Monkey830 | June 22nd, 2004 @ 12:06 pm

Doesn’t this result in the cache directory becoming full of files that aren’t used (older versions of pages)?

Alex | June 22nd, 2004 @ 12:51 pm

Does not play well with AK’s ‘New Since Last Visit’ plugin.

Tao of Dowingba » Reloaded | June 23rd, 2004 @ 2:13 am

[...] [...]

supernoob | June 24th, 2004 @ 3:13 pm

Hrm. I’m running into a problem with the required include file (for blogrolls) being cached as well. The output isn’t updated unless a new comment or entry is added in WP and it should be dynamic.

In my index.php file I have a require in there pointing to my blogroll:

< ?php require 'includes/blogroll.php'; ?>

blogroll.php contents are simply:

< ?php wp_get_links(1); ?>

Any ideas if I missed something or am doing something wrong? If I shut off the caching plugin, it updates properly.

Thanks!

supernoob | June 24th, 2004 @ 3:16 pm

Hrm. Code seems to have been stripped out of the above comment when surrounded by code tags. I’ll try again:

index.php:
<?php require ‘includes/blogroll.php’; ?>

blogroll.php:
<?php wp_get_links(1); ?>

Eli Sarver | June 24th, 2004 @ 6:47 pm

You might want to do something about caching pages before they are gzipped. I think I’ll turn on mod_compress to get around this issue.

中文WordPress » WP网页静态化 | July 15th, 2004 @ 5:30 pm

[...] Mikeluæ�"°çš„æ�"‡ç« ä¸­æŽ¨èäº†ä¸¤ç§ï¼�'一种是Matt写的staticize的工具ï¼�'另一个是jens写的Prerendering工具 [...]

Daniel | August 24th, 2004 @ 12:44 am

This is excellent, I must say. The benefits of static pages without the pain of republishing.

One issue however: it doesn’t appear to rebuild pages when a trackback comes in. I’ve tried this on a couple of WP installations, and it seems to be consistent in this.

Sean_Long | August 30th, 2004 @ 10:24 pm

I have a problem when using Staticize Reloaded plugin provided with the 2004.08.30 nightly build of WordPress. WordPress is installed into a different directory using this method: different address.

The “different address” hack works without the plugin activated. When activated, I have this error message:

Warning: main(/home/seanlong/www/wp//wp/wp-header.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/seanlong/www/index.php on line 4

Warning: main(): Failed opening ‘/home/seanlong/www/wp//wp/wp-header.php’ for inclusion (include_path=’.:/usr/local/lib/php’) in /home/seanlong/www/index.php on line 4

Any ideas?

Michael | September 9th, 2004 @ 11:09 pm

The exclude syntax doesn’t work with BBClone Stats. Tested on three blogs. Nonetheless still very cool.

Paul Hoch | September 30th, 2004 @ 7:02 pm

After installing it, everything seems cool, although my RSS feed doesn’t appear to refresh. Is there a workaround? I’ve checked in two different readers (Firefox live bookmars, and RSS Bandit). Since I activated the plugin neither has received anything new.

mskallas | December 2nd, 2004 @ 1:20 pm

Getting:

Parse error: parse error in /web/script/skallas/nerdfilter.com/wp-content/cache/2d1279da46f6ac2c2771aecbcdd1ec0e.php on line 1

ricardo galli | December 24th, 2004 @ 7:13 pm

I found an important concurrency bug: if more than a client access to the same page, the same content could be appended several times to the same cache file.

It’s repeatable by using Apache Benchmark (ab).

Matt | December 25th, 2004 @ 12:22 pm

Ricardo, I’ll look into that.

Rian | May 26th, 2005 @ 6:08 pm

This plugin has successfully turned my WP pages into gibberish 50% of the time. In Opera and Firefox both. Sometimes refreshing it fixes it, and sometimes it doesn’t.

Anyone else have this problem?

Brandon Harper | July 6th, 2005 @ 9:15 pm

This plugin has been updated here:

http://mnm.uib.es/gallir/wp-cache-2/

If you’ve had problems with it (my RSS was breaking for instance), you might want to try the latest version.

Joseph | December 15th, 2005 @ 9:55 pm

No thanks, i think i’ll stay away from something that can wreak havoc and bust your set up just to save a few miliseconds of time that you can do easily by just trimming the fat off the site. Laziness can make more trouble than using a little effort.

Still, hope you guys finally work it out.