Sep
12

XHTML Means Business

Filed under: Asides | September 12th, 2004
Post

A business case for XHTML, a good review of the arguments for semantic markup in general and XHTML in particular. (6)

6 Responses

  • Josh Street | September 12th, 2004 @ 5:05 am

    Nice find. /me passes link around to everyone I know who ever said anything against webstandards/XHTML…

    Current score: 0
  • Porter | September 12th, 2004 @ 9:17 am

    Be sure to read through the comments, though… The article really should be titled “The Economics of Semantic Markup.”

    Current score: 0
  • Simon Willison | September 12th, 2004 @ 11:51 am

    What Porter said. Semantic/structural/whatever-you-want-to-call-it markup brings huge benefits, as discussed in that article. After 16 months of using XHTML, all it’s given me is extra problems. I still like the idea of making sure any content chunks stored in a database are valid XHTML, but I have to admit that I haven’t seen any practical benefits from doing that yet either. I could list dozens of potential benefits but so far I’ve had no reason to actually apply any of them.

    Current score: 0
  • Rakesh Pai | September 13th, 2004 @ 4:35 am

    Agreed, Simon. Really, I couldn’t find convincing reasons to abandon semantic HTML in favour of XHTML. The extra effort is difficult to justify in terms of quantifiable amounts. Any ideas how we could make a business case to justify the extra effort?

    Current score: 0
  • Simon Willison | September 13th, 2004 @ 9:52 am

    Rakesh: absolutely none, because I’m pretty much convinced there isn’t a business case to justify the extra effort. The only real benefit XHTML provides is that it’s easier to use XML tools to process your own data, which is why I’m so keen on keeping databased content stored as XML. As far as serving content up to clients goes, there really aren’t any benefits. I used to talk about future devices such as mobile phones only understanding XHTML but it’s clear now that that isn’t going to happen - if you released a browsing device that couldn’t parse HTML it would be limited to the fraction of a percentage point of the web which is valic XHTML, and that would be commercial suicide.

    Current score: 0
  • Matt | September 13th, 2004 @ 10:48 am

    I think any business where “Zeldman said so” isn’t a perfectly valid reason for doing something isn’t a business I’d want to work at. ;)

    Personally I prefer the strictness of XHTML 1.1 even though I don’t do anything fancy with it. I guess I’m a HTML masochist.

    Current score: 0

Share your thoughts