Baby Name Chart

8 Responses

• 

  chris bevan | February 16th, 2005 @ 4:17 pm

  i wish it was flash. unfortunately it’s the mother of all java applets.

  Current score: 0 +1
• 

  Lionfire | February 16th, 2005 @ 5:40 pm

  Not that it makes a huge difference, but that’s actually Java (not Flash).

  Current score: 0 +1
• 

  Matt | February 16th, 2005 @ 6:21 pm

  Thanks for the correction!

  Current score: 0 +1
• 

  Charleen | February 16th, 2005 @ 9:32 pm

  That was fun!!! I played w/ it for about an hour!!!! You just like it b/c it’s got you at number 3 for about 40 years. I like it b/c only one in every 50 million babies has my name (at its peak…in the 40’s!). Pretty colors!!! Now for bed…..love, C

  Current score: 0 +1
• 

  Charleen | February 16th, 2005 @ 9:33 pm

  I just noticed that your blog is now on pacific time. Weird. Love, c

  Current score: 0 +1
• 

  Tom Raftery | February 17th, 2005 @ 12:40 am

  Shame it doesn’t work on a Mac

  Tom

  Current score: 0 +1
• 

  eliot | February 19th, 2005 @ 9:18 am

  Oooh fun…. I didn’t realize my name peaked in the 60s at #966. There’s hardly anything before or after that period. But the neat thing is you can check other spellings and see how their trend has been. So much fun!

  Current score: 0 +1
• 

  David Sandey | May 12th, 2005 @ 4:19 pm

  Great for research familiar but uncommon names for my new baby!

  Current score: 0 +1